People
are getting familiar with web and mobile applications. They have not
just developed an understanding about the apps but simplifying their
day to day needs with online services and apps in their innovative
ways. The shift of how a user uses an application and engage with it
changed things dramatically. Today's applications need to be more
feature rich and engaging for users. The happenings like this
increased complexity with front-end development.
To accelerate the development time, developers follow the standard practices which have been used to simplify some recurring issues. These standard practices or reusable components are enclosed within frameworks or libraries. In the past few years, we have seen several frameworks emerged into the app development ecosystem with innovative features and enabled development of more of these feature-rich apps. Here, we will compare two popular and trending frameworks, AngularJS and EmberJS.
Can't Go Wrong With Either One
We have picked these frameworks as both of front-end development technology are supported by active user communities. Continues contribution of active users to the growth of framework help AngularJSDevelopment Services Providers to be geared with advanced tools to get almost everything a modern web app requires. Let's embrace both the front-end frameworks and what are the advantages and disadvantages.
Angular: Angular is a client-side open source JS framework. It's the latest version is available as Angular 6.0.7 and is supported by TypeScript which supports effective development of heavy single page applications.
Ember: Ember.Js is a full-featured open source framework based on MVVM pattern. The framework enables Ember.jsDeveloper to create beautifully rendered, dynamic SPAs.
What Framework is Better?
To get the answer to this question, let's look at some key moments that define almost every technology.
Communities: Communities plays a significant role while choosing a framework. The more significant will be the community, more answers to questions and more growth. We fund on Google Trends when compared both frameworks. Angular maintains its leads over Ember from the last 5 years.
To accelerate the development time, developers follow the standard practices which have been used to simplify some recurring issues. These standard practices or reusable components are enclosed within frameworks or libraries. In the past few years, we have seen several frameworks emerged into the app development ecosystem with innovative features and enabled development of more of these feature-rich apps. Here, we will compare two popular and trending frameworks, AngularJS and EmberJS.
Can't Go Wrong With Either One
We have picked these frameworks as both of front-end development technology are supported by active user communities. Continues contribution of active users to the growth of framework help AngularJSDevelopment Services Providers to be geared with advanced tools to get almost everything a modern web app requires. Let's embrace both the front-end frameworks and what are the advantages and disadvantages.
Angular: Angular is a client-side open source JS framework. It's the latest version is available as Angular 6.0.7 and is supported by TypeScript which supports effective development of heavy single page applications.
Ember: Ember.Js is a full-featured open source framework based on MVVM pattern. The framework enables Ember.jsDeveloper to create beautifully rendered, dynamic SPAs.
What Framework is Better?
To get the answer to this question, let's look at some key moments that define almost every technology.
Communities: Communities plays a significant role while choosing a framework. The more significant will be the community, more answers to questions and more growth. We fund on Google Trends when compared both frameworks. Angular maintains its leads over Ember from the last 5 years.
Framework
Size : Loading time of an application is a critical factor in its
success. Users do not have patience, thus developers must focus to
speed up the download as much as possible. There are two factors
which influence this: size of the framework and the time it takes to
run.
Here
we compare the net size of frameworks as well as their dependencies'
sizes.
Framework
|
Net
Size
|
Size
With required dependencies
|
Angular
6.0.7
|
698k
|
1023k
(RxJS and router and HTTP client)
|
Ember
3.2.0
|
435k
(including the router)
|
435k
(including the router)
|
The
above chart clears things easily.
Let's
shed some light on some advantages and disadvantages of both
technologies.
Angular
6.0.7
|
Ember
3.2.0
|
|
Advantages
|
Typescript
helps identify value type errors at an early stage. It also may
help you to understand what data structures work better thus build
bulky applications under control.
|
Perfect
routing. Route handlers for the URLs are enabled to see a
comprehensive range of conceivable application states,
asynchronous logic in the router determines promises. And
implementing is justifiable.
|
Zone.js
provides additional control over the execution context function,
as well as solves the problem of loss of context.
|
Easy
APIs. Ember provides really easy to work with APIs
|
|
RxJS
is a powerful tool for working with data streams integrated into
Angular.
|
High
performance. This is because of fact that similar tasks are
processed in one go.
|
|
Angular
has a high degree of modularity, which allows you to connect to
the application only the necessary parts.
|
Complete
front-end stack. It comes with its own asset pipeline, router,
services, etc.
|
|
The
building process has multiple optimization stages, which
eventually positively affects the size of the final files.
|
Almost
no need for configuration. According to Ember's philosophy of
"convention over configuration", it already has nearly
everything configured for you, so you're able to start coding and
developing your project almost at once.
|
|
A
robust ecosystem of plug-ins, add-ons and dev tools result in a
fast development process.
|
Ready-made
structure of the application. The framework determines the general
application structure and organization for it's users. This was
performed to forestall developers from making mistakes which would
only perplex their apps.
|
|
Disadvantages
|
Sometimes
redundant error checking with Typescript makes you spend extra
time on type declarations; there is also a chance of encountering
problems when using external libraries with missing declarations.
|
Steep
learning curve. Ember is not so easy for beginners as it might
seem.
|
Zone.js
- wraps its methods to a lot of global features and methods, which
affects the integration capabilities.
|
Too
much convention, too little configuration
|
|
Angular
CLI is a bit behind the Angular capabilities, and some features
remain unavailable when using CLI tool to scaffold a project.
|
Hard
to use if your API isn't REASTful
|
|
Relatively
slow when it comes to displaying enormous amounts of data.
|
Very
little flexibility
|