AngularJs vs EmberJs

People are getting familiar with web and mobile applications. They have not just developed an understanding about the apps but simplifying their day to day needs with online services and apps in their innovative ways. The shift of how a user uses an application and engage with it changed things dramatically. Today's applications need to be more feature rich and engaging for users. The happenings like this increased complexity with front-end development.

To accelerate the development time, developers follow the standard practices which have been used to simplify some recurring issues. These standard practices or reusable components are enclosed within frameworks or libraries. In the past few years, we have seen several frameworks emerged into the app development ecosystem with innovative features and enabled development of more of these feature-rich apps. Here, we will compare two popular and trending frameworks, AngularJS and EmberJS.

Can't Go Wrong With Either One

We have picked these frameworks as both of front-end development technology are supported by active user communities. Continues contribution of active users to the growth of framework help AngularJSDevelopment Services Providers to be geared with advanced tools to get almost everything a modern web app requires. Let's embrace both the front-end frameworks and what are the advantages and disadvantages.

Angular: Angular is a client-side open source JS framework. It's the latest version is available as Angular 6.0.7 and is supported by TypeScript which supports effective development of heavy single page applications.

Ember: Ember.Js is a full-featured open source framework based on MVVM pattern. The framework enables Ember.jsDeveloper to create beautifully rendered, dynamic SPAs.

What Framework is Better?

To get the answer to this question, let's look at some key moments that define almost every technology.

Communities: Communities plays a significant role while choosing a framework. The more significant will be the community, more answers to questions and more growth. We fund on Google Trends when compared both frameworks. Angular maintains its leads over Ember from the last 5 years. 

Framework Size : Loading time of an application is a critical factor in its success. Users do not have patience, thus developers must focus to speed up the download as much as possible. There are two factors which influence this: size of the framework and the time it takes to run.

Here we compare the net size of frameworks as well as their dependencies' sizes.

Framework	Net Size	Size With required dependencies
Angular 6.0.7	698k	1023k (RxJS and router and HTTP client)
Ember 3.2.0	435k (including the router)	435k (including the router)

The above chart clears things easily.

Let's shed some light on some advantages and disadvantages of both technologies.

	Angular 6.0.7	Ember 3.2.0
Advantages	Typescript helps identify value type errors at an early stage. It also may help you to understand what data structures work better thus build bulky applications under control.	Perfect routing. Route handlers for the URLs are enabled to see a comprehensive range of conceivable application states, asynchronous logic in the router determines promises. And implementing is justifiable.
	Zone.js provides additional control over the execution context function, as well as solves the problem of loss of context.	Easy APIs. Ember provides really easy to work with APIs
	RxJS is a powerful tool for working with data streams integrated into Angular.	High performance. This is because of fact that similar tasks are processed in one go.
	Angular has a high degree of modularity, which allows you to connect to the application only the necessary parts.	Complete front-end stack. It comes with its own asset pipeline, router, services, etc.
	The building process has multiple optimization stages, which eventually positively affects the size of the final files.	Almost no need for configuration. According to Ember's philosophy of "convention over configuration", it already has nearly everything configured for you, so you're able to start coding and developing your project almost at once.
	A robust ecosystem of plug-ins, add-ons and dev tools result in a fast development process.	Ready-made structure of the application. The framework determines the general application structure and organization for it's users. This was performed to forestall developers from making mistakes which would only perplex their apps.
Disadvantages	Sometimes redundant error checking with Typescript makes you spend extra time on type declarations; there is also a chance of encountering problems when using external libraries with missing declarations.	Steep learning curve. Ember is not so easy for beginners as it might seem.
	Zone.js - wraps its methods to a lot of global features and methods, which affects the integration capabilities.	Too much convention, too little configuration
	Angular CLI is a bit behind the Angular capabilities, and some features remain unavailable when using CLI tool to scaffold a project.	Hard to use if your API isn't REASTful
	Relatively slow when it comes to displaying enormous amounts of data.	Very little flexibility